Abstract
High-throughput proteome profiling requires thorough optimization to achieve comprehensive analysis. We developed a filter aided sample preparation (FASP)-like, detergent-free method, termed Filter-Based Protein Digestion (FPD). We compared FPD to protein extraction methods commonly used in isobaric tag-based proteome profiling, namely trichloroacetic acid (TCA) and chloroform-methanol (C-M) precipitation. We divided a mammalian whole cell lysate from the SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cell line for parallel protein processing with TCA (n = 3), C-M (n = 2), and FPD using either 10 kDa (n = 3) or 30 kDa (n = 3) molecular weight cutoff membranes. We labeled each sample with tandem mass tag (TMT) reagents to construct a TMT11-plex experiment. In total, 8654 proteins were quantified across all samples. Pairwise comparisons showed very little deviation for individual protein abundance measurements between the two FPD methods, whereas TCA and FPD showed the most difference. Specifically, membrane proteins were more readily quantified when samples were processed using TCA precipitation than other methods tested. However, globally, only 4% of proteins differed greater than 4-fold in the most divergent pair of protein extraction methods (i.e., FPD10 and TCA). We conclude that the detergent-free FPD strategy, particularly using the faster-flowing 30 kDa filter, is a seamless alteration to high-throughput TMT workflows.