Comparison of Emergency Medicine Resident and Attending Physician Approval Rates in Online Medical Control: A 10-year Retrospective Analysis

急诊医学住院医师和主治医师在在线医疗控制中批准率的比较:一项为期10年的回顾性分析

阅读:2

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We assessed whether emergency medicine residents, after completing a structured 4-hour training program and supervised proctoring, demonstrate decision making in online medical control comparable with that of board-certified attending physicians. METHODS: This was a retrospective cross-sectional study of online medical direction calls to the University Medical Centre of El Paso, the emergency medical services (EMS) base station for the El Paso Fire Department. First-year residents completed a 4-hour curriculum covering EMS systems, protocols, ethics, communication, and simulation, followed by 5 supervised calls. We analyzed all online medical control encounters between August 2016 and August 2025. Calls lacking a binary approval outcome were excluded. Approval/disapproval rates were compared between residents and attendings using Fisher's exact test for small samples, chi-square tests for overall comparisons, and 2-proportion z-tests for large categories. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CIs were calculated. Equivalence testing applied a prespecified margin of ± 3%. RESULTS: Of 10,492 calls, 8405 were eligible. Residents (n = 6589) approved 93.4% of requests versus 93.1% for attendings (n = 1816) (χ(2) = 0.11, P = .74; OR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.84-1.29). Category-level comparisons revealed no statistically significant differences, with Fisher's exact P > 0.05 for all subgroups. Patient refusals (99.5% vs 100%) and termination of resuscitation (98.0% vs 99.4%) were uniformly high across both groups. The 2 one-sided test procedure confirmed equivalence, with a 90% CI for the difference (-0.85% to 1.35%) falling entirely within the ±3% margin. CONCLUSION: Emergency medicine residents trained with a focused 4-hour curriculum and limited supervised experience performed online medical control duties at a level statistically and clinically equivalent to attending physicians across a decade of real-world EMS consultations. This model provided a practical and efficient way to include residents in EMS medical direction roles, supporting both system capacity and residency education.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。