Abstract
A major concern of resequencing studies is that the pathogenicity of most mutations is difficult to predict. To address this concern, linkage (i.e. co-segregation) analysis is often used to exclude neutral mutations and to better predict pathogenicity among the candidate mutations that remain. However, when linkage disequilibrium (LD) is present in the population but ignored in the analysis, unlinked regions with high LD can inflate the type 1 error and thousands of neutral mutations may be mistakenly included in a follow-up resequencing study, which could dramatically reduce the power to identify causal variants. To illustrate the need for concern, we simulated data on a sparsely spaced panel of single nucleotide polymorphisms (average spacing 1.27 cM) using an LD pattern estimated from real data. In our simulations, we find that the type 1 error of the maximum LOD can be as high as 14%. Therefore, to control the type 1 error of linkage tests we created Haplodrop - a fast and flexible simulation program that generates the haplotypes of founders with LD and then 'drops' these haplotypes with recombination to all non-founders in the pedigree. Haplodrop can be used to control the type 1 error of any linkage test, agrees well with existing software, accommodates arbitrary pedigree structures, and scales easily to the whole genome. Moreover, by correctly excluding mutations that lie in unlinked regions with high LD, Haplodrop should aid significantly in reducing the multiple testing burden of follow-up resequencing studies.