Abstract
Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the reliability of muscle oxygen saturation (SmO(2)) and its correlation with variables from an inertial measurement unit (IMU) sensor placed on the knee at different exercise intensities. Methods: Fourteen university athletes participated in the study. Incremental ergospirometry was performed to exhaustion to calculate V'O(2)max, determine training zones, heart rate, and workload using the IMU, and analyze muscle metabolism by SmO(2). Results: The analysis revealed significant differences between moderate-to-high-intensity zones (80-89% vs. 50-69%, Δ = 27% of SmO(2); p < 0.001) and high-intensity zones (90-100% vs. 50-79%, Δ = 35% of SmO(2); p < 0.001). SmO(2) values showed moderate reliability at moderate exercise intensities (e.g., ICC 0.744 at 50%) and high variability at higher intensities, with ICC values around 0.577-0.594, and CV% increasing up to 77.7% at 100% intensity, indicating decreasing consistency as exercise intensity increases. SmO(2) significantly decreases with increasing angular velocity (β = -13.9, p < 0.001), while knee joint load only shows significant correlations with SmO(2) in the moderate-to-high-intensity zones (r = 0.569, p = 0.004) and high-intensity zones (r = 0.455, p = 0.012). Conclusions: SmO(2) is a key predictor of performance during maximal incremental exercise, particularly in high-intensity zones. Moreover, SmO(2) has the potential to serve as a physiological marker of the internal load on the muscles surrounding the knee during exercise. The SmO(2) decrease could depend on the angular velocity and impact of the exposed knee during running.