Abstract
BACKGROUND: Distinguishing between non-severe and severe dengue is crucial for timely intervention and reducing morbidity and mortality. World Health Organization (WHO)-recommended warning signs offer a practical approach for clinicians but have limited sensitivity and specificity. This study aims to evaluate machine learning (ML) model performance compared to WHO-recommended warning signs in predicting severe dengue among laboratory-confirmed cases in Puerto Rico. METHODS: We analyzed data from Puerto Rico's Sentinel Enhanced Dengue Surveillance System (May 2012-August 2024), using 40 clinical, demographic, and laboratory variables. Nine ML models, including Decision Trees, K-Nearest Neighbors, Naïve Bayes, Support Vector Machines, Artificial Neural Networks, AdaBoost, CatBoost, LightGBM, and XGBoost, were trained using fivefold cross-validation and evaluated with area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC), sensitivity, and specificity. A subanalysis excluded hemoconcentration and leukopenia to assess performance in resource-limited settings. An AUC-ROC value of 0.5 indicates no discriminative power, while values closer to 1.0 reflect better performance. RESULTS: Among the 1708 laboratory-confirmed dengue cases, 24.3% were classified as severe. Gradient boosting algorithms achieved the highest predictive performance, with an AUC-ROC of 97.1% (95% CI: 96.0-98.3%) for CatBoost using the full 40-variable feature set. Feature importance analysis identified hemoconcentration (≥ 20% increase during illness or ≥ 20% above baseline for age and sex), leukopenia (white blood cell count < 4000/mm(3)), and timing of presentation at 4-6 days post-symptom onset as key predictors. When excluding hemoconcentration and leukopenia, the CatBoost AUC-ROC was 96.7% (95% CI: 95.5-98.0%), demonstrating minimal reduction in performance. Individual warning signs like abdominal pain and restlessness had sensitivities of 79.0% and 64.6%, but lower specificities of 48.4% and 59.1%, respectively. Combining ≥ 3 warning signs improved specificity (80.9%) while maintaining moderate sensitivity (78.6%), resulting in an AUC-ROC of 74.0%. CONCLUSIONS: ML models, especially gradient boosting algorithms, outperformed traditional warning signs in predicting severe dengue. Integrating these models into clinical decision-support tools could help clinicians better identify high-risk patients, guiding timely interventions like hospitalization, closer monitoring, or the administration of intravenous fluids. The subanalysis excluding hemoconcentration confirmed the models' applicability in resource-limited settings, where access to laboratory data may be limited.