Doppler ultrasound, CT angiography, MR angiography, and contrast‐enhanced MR angiography versus intra‐arterial angiography for moderate and severe carotid stenosis in symptomatic patients

多普勒超声、CT血管造影、MR血管造影和对比增强MR血管造影与动脉内血管造影在有症状患者的中重度颈动脉狭窄诊断中的比较

阅读:1

Abstract

This is a protocol for a Cochrane Review (Diagnostic test accuracy). The objectives are as follows: The primary objective is to determine the accuracy of colour DUS, CT angiography, MR angiography, and contrast‐enhanced MR angiography in comparison with intra‐arterial angiography in patients with symptoms attributable to carotid stenosis (transient ischaemic attack, minor stroke, retinal artery occlusion, or amaurosis fugax). To reflect clinical practice, the review will consider each of the four index tests used singly, and also colour DUS followed by any of the four index tests. This work is based on an earlier systematic review (Wardlaw 2006). We therefore know that many articles do not report the data needed to investigate the heterogeneity due to differences in the patient population (age, gender, whether the symptom affected the eye or brain), differences in the expertise of the people making the diagnoses, and the time interval between the index and reference tests. We had also investigated generation of technology (using year of publication as a proxy) and did not find evidence that it was a significant source of heterogeneity.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。