Pulse oximeter saturation target limits for preterm infants: a survey among European neonatal intensive care units

早产儿脉搏血氧饱和度目标限值:一项针对欧洲新生儿重症监护病房的调查

阅读:1

Abstract

The optimum range of pulse oximeter oxygen saturation (SpO(2)) for preterm infants remains controversial. Between November 2015 and February 2016, we conducted a web-based survey aimed to investigate the current and former practices on SpO(2) targets in European neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). We obtained valid responses from 193 NICUs, treating 8590 newborns ≤28 weeks per year, across 27 countries. Forty different saturation ranges were reported, ranging from 82-93 to 94-99%. The most frequently utilized SpO(2) ranges were 90-95% (28%), 88-95% (12%), 90-94% (5%), and 91-95% (5%). A total of 156 NICUs (81%) changed their SpO(2) limits over the last 10 years. The most frequently reported former limits were 88-92% (18%), 85-95% (9%), 88-93 (7%), and 85-92% (6%). The NICUs that increased their SpO(2) ranges expected to obtain a reduction in mortality. A 54% of the NICUs found the scientific evidence supporting their SpO(2) targeting policy strong or very strong. CONCLUSION: We detected a high degree of heterogeneity in pulse oximeter SpO(2) target limits across European NICUs. The currently used limits are 3 to 5% higher than the former limits, and the most extreme limits, such as lower below 85% or upper above 96%, have almost been abandoned. What is Known: • For preterm infants requiring supplemental oxygen, the optimum range of pulse oximeter oxygen saturation (SpO (2) ) to minimize organ damage, without causing hypoxic injury, remains controversial. What is New: • This survey highlights the lack of consensus regarding SpO (2) target limits for preterm infants among European neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). We detected 40 different SpO (2) ranges, and even the most frequently reported range (i.e., 90-95%) was used in only 28% of the 193 respondent NICUs. • A total of 156 NICUs (81%) changed their SpO (2) limits over the last 10 years. The currently used limits are 3 to 5% higher than the former limits, and the most extreme limits, such as lower below 85% or upper above 96%, have almost been abandoned.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。