Abstract
As the sophistication of machine learning force fields (MLFF) increases to match the complexity of extended molecules and materials, so does the need for tools to properly analyze and assess the practical performance of MLFFs. To go beyond average error metrics and into a complete picture of a model's applicability and limitations, we developed FFAST (force field analysis software and tools): a cross-platform software package designed to gain detailed insights into a model's performance and limitations, complete with an easy-to-use graphical user interface. The software allows the user to gauge the performance of any molecular force field,─such as popular state-of-the-art MLFF models, ─ on various popular data set types, providing general prediction error overviews, outlier detection mechanisms, atom-projected errors, and more. It has a 3D visualizer to find and picture problematic configurations, atoms, or clusters in a large data set. In this paper, the example of the MACE and NequIP models is used on two data sets of interest [stachyose and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA)]─to illustrate the use cases of the software. With this, it was found that carbons and oxygens involved in or near glycosidic bonds inside the stachyose molecule present increased prediction errors. In addition, prediction errors on DHA rise as the molecule folds, especially for the carboxylic group at the edge of the molecule. We emphasize the need for a systematic assessment of MLFF models for ensuring their successful application to the study of dynamics of molecules and materials.