Abstract
We present an investigation of the excited-state structural parameters determined for a large set of small compounds with the dual goals of defining reference values for further works and assessing the quality of the geometries obtained with relatively cheap computational approaches. In the first stage, we compare the excited-state geometries obtained with ADC(2), CC2, CCSD, CCSDR(3), CC3, and CASPT2 and large atomic basis sets. It is found that CASPT2 and CC3 results are generally in very good agreement with one another (typical differences of ca. 3 × 10(-3) Å) when all electrons are correlated and when the aug-cc-pVTZ atomic basis set is employed with both methods. In a second stage, a statistical analysis reveals that, on the one hand, the excited-state (ES) bond lengths are much more sensitive to the selected level of theory than their ground-state (GS) counterparts and, on the other hand, that CCSDR(3) is probably the most cost-effective method delivering accurate structures. Indeed, CCSD tends to provide too compact multiple bond lengths on an almost systematic basis, whereas both CC2 and ADC(2) tend to exaggerate these bond distances, with more erratic error patterns, especially for the latter method. The deviations are particularly marked for the polarized CO and CN bonds, as well as for the puckering angle in formaldehyde homologues. In the last part of this contribution, we provide a series of CCSDR(3) GS and ES geometries of medium-sized molecules to be used as references in further investigations.