The hubris of Blair, Bush—and journal editors

布莱尔、布什以及期刊编辑们的傲慢自大

阅读:1

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine the quality of diabetes management in primary care after the publication of the National Service Framework and examine the impact of age, gender and deprivation on the achievement of established quality indicators. DESIGN: Population-based cross sectional survey using electronic general practice records carried out between June-October 2003. SETTING: Thirty-four practices in Wandsworth, South-West London, UK. PARTICIPANTS: 6035 adult patients (> or =18 years) with diabetes from a total registered population of 201,572 patients. INTERVENTIONS: None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Success rates for the diabetes quality indicators within the General Medical Services contract for general practitioners. RESULTS: We identified large variations in diabetes management between general practitioner practices with poorer recording of quality care in younger patients (18-44 years). In addition, younger patients had a worse cholesterol and glycaemia profile, although hypertension was more common in older patients. Gender and deprivation did not appear to be important determinants of the quality of care received. CONCLUSIONS: There are large variations in diabetes management between general practitioner practices, with care seemingly worse for younger adults. Longitudinal studies are required to determine whether current UK quality improvement initiatives have been successful in attenuating existing variations in care and treatment outcomes.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。