Abstract
In 1997, doctors in England received official guidelines on the use of statins (3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A inhibitors) for primary and secondary prevention of coronary heart disease (CHD). Six months later we determined the status of patients who had been discharged from a specialist lipid clinic in 1989. 195 patients received questionnaires, with the consent of their general practitioners, regarding morbidity in, the subsequent decade and present medication, and were asked to have their cholesterol checked. Analysis was confined to the 86 with a current cholesterol measurement. Of 61 patients who had been discharged on a regimen of dietary advice and/or medication for primary prevention of CHD, 8 had been changed to a statin and 6 had been started on one. According to the new guidelines, none of these qualified for treatment. Of 25 patients who had been discharged on drugs for secondary prevention, all qualified for a statin but only 14 were receiving one--in 6 cases without achieving the recommended reductions in cholesterol. In many of the patients reviewed, treatment had not been altered to conform with the new guidelines. If hyperlipidaemic patients are to benefit promptly from advances in treatment, one solution might be a central registry that arranged regular tests and reported back to general practitioners. However, since many patients at risk do not have very high cholesterol levels, a coordinated approach to CHD risk factors would be preferable.