Abstract
Objective We compared an infrared temporal artery thermometer with our clinical standard axillary thermometer for temperature measurements in neonatal patients. Study Design We measured temporal artery (T(ta)), axillary (T(ax), clinical standard), and rectal (T(r), gold standard) temperatures of 49 infants. The difference between T(r) and T(ta) was compared with that between T(r) and T(ax), and the data were analyzed based on bed type and postmenstrual age. Results The mean T(ta), T(ax), and T(r) were 37.16 (SD 0.36) °C, 36.61 (SD 0.30) °C, and 36.82 (SD 0.30) °C, respectively. The measurements by these methods were all significantly different. The mean T(r)-T(ax) was 0.21 (SD 0.26) °C, and the mean T(r)-T(ta) was -0.34 (SD 0.37) °C, indicating that T(ax) was closer to T(r) than was T(ta) (p < 0.0001). T(ta) agreed more closely with T(r) for infants in cribs than for those in incubators. Adjusting for bed type and body weight, with each week of postmenstrual age, the discrepancy between T(r)-T(ta) and T(r)-T(ax) decreased by 0.005°C (p = 0.034). Conclusion Compared with the gold standard, T(r), T(ta) is not more accurate than T(ax). The temporal artery thermometer was less accurate for infants in incubators than for infants in cribs. The accuracy of temporal artery temperature increased with postmenstrual age.