Abstract
INTRODUCTION: In patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), mortality risk is typically assessed using the arterial partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2) divided by the fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2), known as the PaO2/FiO2 ratio. Recently, the SpO2/FiO2 ratio, which uses peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2) instead of PaO2, has been suggested as a reasonable alternative when there is little access to arterial blood gas analyses. Additionally, equations that predict PaO2 from SpO2 values could offer another viable method for assessment. AIM: To evaluate the accuracy of methods for predicting PaO2 from SpO2 values and compare risk stratification based on measured versus predicted PaO2/FiO2 ratios using a large database that harmonizes the individual data of patients included in four observational studies. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The individual data from four observational studies ('Epidemiology of Respiratory Insufficiency in Critical Care study' [ERICC], 'Large Observational Study to Understand the Global Impact of Severe Acute Respiratory Failure' [LUNG SAFE], 'PRactice of VENTilation in critically ill patients without ARDS' [PRoVENT], and 'PRactice of VENTilation in critically ill patients in Middle-income Countries' [PRoVENT-iMiC]) were harmonized and pooled into a database named 'PRoPERLy II'. The primary endpoint of this planned analysis will be the accuracy of currently available methods to predict PaO2 from SpO2 values. The secondary endpoint will be the accuracy of classification based on SpO2/FiO2 ratio and the predicted PaO2/FiO2 ratio. DISSEMINATION: Our planned analysis addresses a clinically important research question by comparing different equations for predicting PaO2 from SpO2 values.