Comparing the interface pressure redistribution after applying three different types of cushions: differences according to cushion type

比较应用三种不同类型气垫后界面压力重新分布情况:气垫类型差异

阅读:1

Abstract

[Purpose] The purpose of this study was to compare the interface pressure redistribution when sitting after applying three different types of cushions and on a firm surface in individuals in their 20s and those older than 60 years old. [Subjects and Methods] Healthy 100 elderly (60 years and older) subjects and 111 college students participated in this study. Interface pressure redistribution while sitting on a firm surface or honeycomb, air, and memory foam cushions, examined in that order. [Results] For all groups, significant differences were found in the total pressure mean among sitting states. When the hip and thigh interface pressure among sitting states were compared within each group, significant differences were found in the mean right hip pressure, mean left hip pressure, peak right hip pressure, peak left hip pressure, right hip pressure ratio, and left hip pressure ratio. [Conclusion] Our data indicated that the type of cushion should be considered and fit for individuals when recommending appropriate interface pressure redistribution cushions.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。