Abstract
INTRODUCTION: A recent study suggested that orally dosed ferric citrate hydrate (FC) corrects renal anemia in patients on hemodialysis (HD), suggesting biological differences in effects of iron supplementation using different routes of administration. To address this issue, the present study compared oral FC with i.v. saccharated ferric oxide (FO) in stable HD patients. METHODS: Participants comprised 6 patients administered 3 consecutive protocols in the first HD session of the week in a fasting state: nothing given, as control (C); oral load of FC (480 mg iron), and 5 minutes of i.v. FO (40 mg iron). Iron dynamics in the body and biological impact on redox-inflammation status during the study (6 hours) were examined. RESULTS: Significant increases in serum iron and transferrin saturation were seen with both FC and FO. Regarding total iron-binding capacity as the sum of serum iron and unsaturated iron-binding capacity, no changes were found in FC, whereas significant increases were seen in FO (appearance of non-transferrin-binding iron [NTBI]), despite the lower serum iron levels in FO. Compared with C, increases were seen in serum myeloperoxidase (oxidative marker) with accompanying significant decreases in thioredoxin (antioxidant) in FO, whereas no changes were found in FC. CONCLUSION: Oral FC differs from i.v. FO in areas such as less NTBI generation and less induction of oxidative stress. The result indicates potential clinical benefits of oral FC in terms of iron supplementation for renal anemia in HD patients.