Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The impact of lobe-specific lymph node dissection (LS-LND) in surgery for NSCLC remains controversial compared with that of systematic lymph node dissection (S-LND). This study aimed to compare clinical outcomes between the two strategies, including postoperative complications, and to explain the advantages of LS-LND. METHODS: We searched for studies comparing LS-LND and S-LND up to April 14, 2022, using PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science. The primary outcomes were overall survival and recurrence-free survival. Secondary outcomes included postoperative complications, such as arrhythmia, chylothorax, and pneumonia. We evaluated the risk of bias and assessed the evidence quality using GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) approach. RESULTS: A total of 13 studies, including one randomized controlled trial and 12 retrospective studies with 11,522 patients who underwent curative resections for lung cancer, were included. The results indicated that LS-LND had favorable overall survival (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.80, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.73-0.87) but no difference in recurrence-free survival (HR = 0.96, 95% CI: 0.84-1.09) on comparison with S-LND. In terms of postoperative complications, patients undergoing LS-LND had a lower rate of chylothorax (risk ratio [RR] = 0.54, 95% CI: 0.35-0.85) and arrhythmia (RR = 0.74, 95% CI: 0.57-0.97) than patients undergoing S-LND, but the risk of postoperative pneumonia was not different. The overall quality of evidence was low to moderate owing to the risk of bias related to heterogeneous study populations. CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing LS-LND had a comparable and favorable long-term prognosis and a lower rate of postoperative complications. Nevertheless, further standardized studies are necessary to improve the quality of evidence.