Real-world effectiveness and safety of upadacitinib in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis: impact of age, renal function, and low-dose therapy

乌帕替尼在日本类风湿关节炎患者中的真实世界疗效和安全性:年龄、肾功能和低剂量治疗的影响

阅读:2

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Upadacitinib (UPA) is an important therapeutic option for rheumatoid arthritis (RA), but evidence in older adults and patients with renal impairment remains limited. This study evaluated the real-world effectiveness and safety of UPA in Japanese patients with RA, including older adults and those with renal impairment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This multicenter retrospective study included 112 patients with RA who received UPA (7.5 or 15 mg/day), with clinical outcomes assessed up to 52 weeks based on medical record review. Effectiveness was assessed using the Disease Activity Score 28–erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR), Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI), and Health Assessment Questionnaire–Disability Index (HAQ-DI). Safety was evaluated based on adverse events and laboratory findings. Predictors of response were explored using multivariable regression, and prespecified subgroup analyses were performed by age (≥ 75 vs. <75 years), renal function (eGFR < 60 vs. ≥60 mL/min/1.73 m²), and UPA dose (7.5 vs. 15 mg/day). RESULTS: At week 52, 87.5% of patients continued UPA, and 62.5% achieved DAS28-ESR remission (< 2.6). Significant improvements in DAS28-ESR and CDAI were observed and maintained through week 52. Similar improvements in disease activity were observed in patients aged ≥ 75 years and in those with renal impairment. Clinical response was associated with baseline disease activity, anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody levels, rheumatoid factor titers, and prior biologic or targeted synthetic DMARD use. The 7.5 mg/day regimen was more frequently prescribed to older patients and those with renal impairment. CONCLUSION: UPA demonstrated sustained effectiveness and acceptable safety across clinically important subgroups of Japanese patients with RA, including older adults and those with renal impairment. These findings suggest the feasibility of individualized treatment strategies; however, dose comparisons should be interpreted cautiously given physician-driven prescribing. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s41927-026-00621-3.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。