Prognostic value of a simplified score based on routine parameters in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma treated with systemic therapies: a retrospective cohort study

基于常规参数的简化评分对接受全身治疗的肝细胞癌患者的预后价值:一项回顾性队列研究

阅读:2

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The systemic treatment landscape for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has evolved from tyrosine kinase inhibitors, such as sorafenib (SOR), to immune checkpoint inhibitor-based combinations (IO). Despite these advances, there is a lack of simple, objective tools to stratify patient prognosis in clinical practice. While several laboratory parameters are known to correlate with outcomes, their combined utility across treatment types remains unclear. We aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of commonly available biomarkers and to develop a simplified score applicable to both SOR- and IO-treated patients. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study analyzed patients with advanced or intermediate-stage HCC treated with first-line systemic therapy at a single center in Brazil from 2009 to 2024. Patients were stratified into a SOR cohort and an IO cohort. Baseline variables included demographics and biochemical markers. We assessed the association between survival and three baseline biomarkers: alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) grade, and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR). A prognostic score was developed in the SOR cohort by assigning one point to each adverse factor: AFP ≥200 ng/mL, ALBI grade 2-3, and NLR ≥3. Overall survival (OS) was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. Hazard ratios (HRs) were derived from Cox regression models. RESULTS: The study included 440 patients in the SOR cohort and 32 in the IO cohort. In the SOR cohort. Most patients in both cohorts were Child-Pugh A, PS 0-1 and hepatitis C was the predominant etiology. AFP ≥200 ng/mL (P<0.001), ALBI 2-3 (P<0.001), and NLR ≥3 (P<0.001) were independently associated with worse OS. Median OS in the SOR cohort was 17.4 months for patients with 0-1 points, 7.9 months for 2 points, and 4.2 months for 3 points (P<0.001). The score remained prognostic in the IO cohort, where patients with 0-1 vs. 2-3 points had significantly different OS (HR 2.2; 95% CI: 1.1-4.9; P=0.04). CONCLUSIONS: This simplified prognostic score, based on three routine laboratory parameters, stratifies survival outcomes in HCC patients receiving either sorafenib or immunotherapy. While further validation is needed in larger and more diverse populations, this tool may support individualized clinical counseling and risk-adapted trial design.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。