Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Surgery is still considered the mainstay of treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). Nevertheless, "curable" disease may still pose a great risk for both local and distant relapses. Since the early eighties of the past century, we have witnessed mounting evidence supporting the multi-modality approach to tackle this disease effectively. The multi-modality approach is variable between different positive trials. In this review, we discuss the treatment evolution of LARC, highlighting the key differences between the different contemporary strategies utilized. Based on current evidence, we sought to define distinct patient subgroups and to propose a treatment algorithm that best fits patient's risk. METHODS: We conducted a literature search through PubMed and Google scholar. Eligible papers were phase 2/3 trials [in organ preservation (OP), observational and retrospective studies were also acceptable] published in English. We used keywords such as "locally advanced rectal cancer", "perioperative therapy in rectal cancer", "short course radiotherapy", "chemoradiation in rectal cancer", "interval to surgery", "Neoadjuvant therapy", "Organ preservation" and "Total neoadjuvant treatment [TNT]". KEY CONTENT AND FINDINGS: Various trials consistently demonstrated the benefit of preoperative radiotherapy in LARC, the role of adjuvant chemotherapy is controversial based on published studies, TNT was associated with a risk reduction in distant metastasis, and more reassuring evidence is accumulating regarding OP. CONCLUSIONS: The treatment landscape of LARC is rapidly changing. Clinicians should carefully tailor treatment strategy based on patient's risk.