Assessment of the external validity of the AJCC 8(th) staging system for small intestinal adenocarcinoma: a time to reconsider the role of tumor location?

评估 AJCC 第 8 版小肠腺癌分期系统的外部有效性:是时候重新考虑肿瘤位置的作用了吗?

阅读:1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The current study evaluates the validity and performance of the 8(th) edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system for small intestinal adenocarcinoma patients. METHODS: Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database [2004-2015] was explored and AJCC 6(th), 7(th), and 8(th) versions were assigned for each patient. Through Kaplan-Meier estimates, overall survival analyses were conducted. Cox regression analysis (adjusted for age, race, gender, sub-site, grade and surgical treatment) was conducted for cancer-specific survival and additionally, pairwise hazard ratio comparisons were performed. RESULTS: A total of 2,997 small intestinal adenocarcinoma patients were eligible and included in the analysis. Overall survival was compared according to the three AJCC staging systems. For the three versions, the P value for the trend in overall survival was significant (P<0.0001). Cancer-specific Cox regression hazard was calculated for the three staging systems. Pairwise hazard ratio comparisons between different AJCC 6(th) stages were conducted and all P values for comparisons were significant (P<0.0001). Pairwise hazard ratio comparisons between different AJCC 7(th) and 8(th) stages were also performed, and all comparisons were significant (P<0.05) except for stage IIB vs. IIIA. C-statistic (using death from small intestinal adenocarcinoma as the dependent variable) for AJCC 6(th) staging system was: 0.645 [standard error (SE): 0.011; 95% CI: 0.623-0.668]; for c-statistic for AJCC 7(th) staging system was 0.658 (SE: 0.011; 95% CI: 0.637-0.680); while c-statistic for AJCC 8(th) staging system was 0.660 (SE: 0.011; 95% CI: 0.638-0.682). Multivariate analysis of factors affecting cancer-specific survival suggested that older age (P=0.005), higher lymph node ratio (P<0.0001) and duodenal localization of the primary are associated with worse outcomes (P=0.008). CONCLUSIONS: There is no evidence that AJCC 8(th) system provided better prognostic characterization compared to previous AJCC staging systems for small intestinal adenocarcinoma. Subsite-specific staging paradigms should be explored in future editions of the staging system.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。