Effect of laser-assisted hatching on ectopic pregnancy after frozen-thawed embryo transfer in patients with a history of ectopic pregnancy: a large cohort study

激光辅助孵化对既往有异位妊娠史患者冻融胚胎移植后异位妊娠的影响:一项大型队列研究

阅读:2

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Assisted hatching (AH) influences embryo implantation, whereas ectopic pregnancy (EP) is embryo ectopic implantation and AH may influence EP. Patients with EP history are at higher risk of EP resulting from IVF/ICSI (IVF-EP), and this is associated with the number of previous EP. However, the effect of laser-AH on IVF-EP in patients with EP history has not been studied so far, so we investigated the effect and considered possible different effects in populations with different numbers of EP. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included all patients with previous EP history receiving frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles at our center between August 2019 and August 2023. A total of 5129 cycles from 2888 patients were grouped according to AH or not. Subgroup analyses were performed based on the number of previous EP (One-EP and > = 2 EP). Binary regression analysis together with generalized estimating equation (GEE) after inverse-probability-of-treatment weighting (IPTW) were performed in all cycles, One-EP cycles, and > = 2 EP cycles respectively to clarify the effect of laser-AH. Stratified regression analysis was also performed based on embryo stage. RESULTS: A total of 1022 cycles were included in the AH group and 4107 cycles were included in the Non-AH group. No statistically significant difference was observed in IVF-EP rate between the two groups (1.4% vs. 2.1%, P = 0.113). In subgroup analyses, AH group had a lower IVF-EP rate than Non-AH group in the One-EP subgroup (1.0% vs. 2.2%, P = 0.028); whereas there was no statistically significant difference in the > = 2 EP subgroup (2.4% vs. 1.9%, P = 0.612). In GEE after IPTW, AH did not influence the IVF-EP rate in the entire population (aOR: 0.888, 95% CI: 0.414–1.904, P = 0.760) and One-EP population (aOR: 0.418, 95% CI: 0.154–1.131, P = 0.086), while increased risk of IVF-EP was observed of AH in > = 2 EP population (aOR: 2.438, 95% CI: 1.509–3.939, P = 0.023). Similar regression results were obtained in cleavage-embryo cycles. CONCLUSIONS: Laser-AH had no effect on IVF-EP after FET in patients with EP history. However, laser-AH was associated with an increased risk of IVF-EP in patients with recurrent EP, suggesting that laser-AH warrants caution in this specific population. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13048-026-02015-y.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。