Abstract
BACKGROUND: Fractures of the proximal humerus represent approximately 4% of all fractures and 26% of humerus fractures. Proper reduction, stable internal fixation and early initiation of physiotherapy help to achieve a good functional outcome. Aim of this study was to evaluate varus fixation/malunion of proximal humerus fractures and its relation to functional outcome. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 32 patients with proximal humerus fractures who were surgically treated between 2015 and 2017 at tertiary care hospital. We divided the patients into three groups on the basis of the neck-shaft angle as valgus group, normal group and varus group to observe the influence of neck-shaft angle on efficacy. Patients were evaluated for functional outcome using the Constant-Murley score. RESULTS: Two-part fractures had better functional outcome (Constant score = 75.15) compared to three parts with the moderate functional outcome (Constant score = 68.81) and the four-part fracture had poor functional outcome (Constant score = 52.66). After 6 months of follow-up, 13 patients had a neck-shaft angle of less than 126°. The functional outcome is significantly better among patients with normal neck-shaft angle and had a mean Constant score of 76.63 as compared to patients with varus deformity had a mean Constant score 60 (p = 0.001). 10 patients did not have medial support, in which 08 patients had neck-shaft angle less than 126° and 2 had a normal neck-shaft angle. CONCLUSION: High fracture comminution, improper restoration of medial continuity causes varus deformity of the humeral head and it leads to poor functional outcome. The small sample size is the limitation of our study.