Impact and effective management of nausea/vomiting on patients treated with zolbetuximab + chemotherapy: insights from the phase III SPOTLIGHT and GLOW studies

佐贝妥昔单抗联合化疗治疗患者恶心/呕吐的影响及有效管理:来自 III 期 SPOTLIGHT 和 GLOW 研究的启示

阅读:2

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In the phase III SPOTLIGHT (NCT03504397) and GLOW (NCT03653507) trials, nausea and/or vomiting were the most common adverse events in patients receiving zolbetuximab plus chemotherapy. We further characterize the adverse effects of nausea/vomiting on treatment adherence and efficacy, and evaluate strategies for managing nausea/vomiting through the SPOTLIGHT and GLOW combined analysis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ad hoc exploratory analyses included treatment discontinuations, antiemetic use, and progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) after censoring patients with inadequate dose exposure (<75% relative exposure intensity) or early discontinuation (within 63 days) of zolbetuximab or placebo initiation. RESULTS: This combined analysis included 1072 patients. Nausea and/or vomiting (nausea/vomiting) were most common on the first zolbetuximab infusion day [nausea: 46.5% (246/529); vomiting: 41.0% (217/529)]; on the second infusion day, nausea dropped to 23.2% (97/418) and vomiting dropped to 24.4% (102/418). Nausea/vomiting continued to decline on subsequent infusion days. More patients on zolbetuximab versus placebo had nausea/vomiting leading to inadequate dose exposure or early discontinuation [9.9% (53/537) versus 0.6% (3/535)]. More white than Asian patients had nausea/vomiting leading to inadequate dose exposure or early discontinuation with zolbetuximab [15.4% (36/234) versus 4.7% (12/254)] and placebo [0.9% (2/224) versus 0.4% (1/255)]. Before censoring, median PFS (mPFS) (hazard ratio) for zolbetuximab versus placebo was 9.2 versus 8.2 months (0.71), and median OS (mOS) was 16.4 versus 13.7 months (0.77). After censoring, mPFS was 10.4 versus 8.2 months (0.65), and mOS was 17.9 versus 13.7 months (0.69). On the first zolbetuximab infusion day, patients without vomiting had higher utilization of three-drug prophylactic regimens than those with vomiting [75.3% (73/97) versus 24.7% (24/97)]. In patients receiving steroids, including as antiemetic prophylaxis, mPFS was 10.5 months with zolbetuximab versus 8.3 months with placebo (0.66), and mOS was 18.4 versus 13.8 months (0.71). CONCLUSION: Optimal antiemetic prophylaxis, with >3 drug classes including steroids, for zolbetuximab-associated nausea/vomiting is important for treatment adherence and maximal clinical benefits.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。