Low mortality and favourable outcome in lung volume reduction surgery for different emphysema morphologies

肺减容手术治疗不同形态肺气肿的死亡率低,预后良好

阅读:1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A quarter of a century after the National Emphysema Treatment Trial (NETT), lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) remains an underused procedure with the notion of high mortality and morbidity, mainly recommended for upper lobe predominant heterogeneous emphysema. With advances in patient selection, minimally invasive surgery and improved recovery, this perception may be outdated. This study evaluates 5-year single-centre outcome, including patients beyond traditional NETT criteria (non-upper lobe and non-heterogeneous morphology). METHODS: This prospective study included all consecutive LVRS procedures (August 2019 to July 2024). Surgical, functional and quality of life outcomes (COPD Assessment Test (CAT) and St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ)) were analysed at 3 and 6 months, and then annually up to 3 years. Subanalysis compared markedly versus non-markedly heterogeneous morphology and isolated versus non-isolated upper lobe disease. RESULTS: 223 procedures were performed in 191 patients with baseline median (interquartile range) forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV(1)) 31% pred (27-37% pred), residual volume (RV) 219% pred (203-250% pred), 6MWD 358 (291-439) m, CAT score 22 (18-25) and SGRQ score 62 (48-71). 30-day mortality was 0.5% (n=1). Hospital stay was 7 (4-10) days; prolonged air leak occurred in 17.9% and infection in 2.2%. At 3 years (n=42/191), FEV(1) improved to 38% pred (29-48% pred), RV to 173% pred (148-199% pred), CAT score to 20 (17-24) and SGRQ score to 55 (39-68), all statistically significant. Morphology was non-markedly heterogeneous in 57.6% and non-isolated upper lobe in 56%, with no significant difference in morbidity. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that LVRS performed in a specialised centre results in exceptionally low mortality and morbidity, and meaningful clinical and functional improvement, supporting broader indications beyond classical NETT criteria.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。