Assessing adoption of human and AI-enabled diabetic retinopathy screening in primary healthcare settings: findings from a pragmatic trial

评估在基层医疗机构中采用人工和人工智能辅助的糖尿病视网膜病变筛查的可行性:一项实用性试验的结果

阅读:2

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Diabetic retinopathy (DR) screening with defined referral pathways is essential for early detection and effective management of DR. This study assessed the adoption of three DR screening (DRS) models in primary healthcare settings, focusing on referral adherence rates and stakeholders' perceptions of the interventions. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted in the Mohali district of Punjab, India, between February 2023 and January 2024. This pragmatic study compared three DRS arms (n = 200 each): I) facility-based screening at health and wellness centres (HWCs) by non-ophthalmologists, II) community-based AI DRS screening at home, and III) standard care involving counselling and referral to district hospitals (DHs). Participants with referable DR or ungradable images were advised for ophthalmology opinion, and their follow-up status and reasons for any non-compliance were assessed after one month. The adoption (acceptability and scalability) of the DRS was assessed via in-depth interviews with stakeholders involved in providing diabetes and DR care in public health settings. RESULTS: Among the 600 participants screened, the average age was 58.22 years (SD ± 11.52). Most participants, 300 (59.57%), were aged 51-70 years, comprising 245 (40.77%) males and 355 (59.23%) females. The referral adherence rates were low, ranging from 13% to 17% across Arms I, II, and III. Barriers to follow-up included lack of awareness, financial limitations, health concerns, perceived good eye health, and transportation challenges. Qualitative findings reveal that DRS, implemented through HWCs and community-based models, is feasible and well-accepted by patients. Stakeholders largely supported the implementation of DRS within primary healthcare settings, though responses varied. Likewise, DRS through HWCs and community-based models is feasible and well-accepted among patients. CONCLUSION: The non-adherence to referrals among study participants is mainly attributable to economic constraints and knowledge gaps. Enhanced point-of-care counselling targeting groups at higher risk of non-adherence for follow-ups, along with a streamlined referral process, can improve the uptake of referral recommendations. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Trial Registry of India (CTRI): 2022/10/046283.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。