Imaging Surveillance After Breast-Conserving Surgery for Cancer With Acellular Dermal Matrix Reconstruction

采用无细胞真皮基质重建术治疗乳腺癌保乳手术后的影像学监测

阅读:1

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate postoperative imaging findings of patients who underwent breast-conserving surgery for cancer and reconstruction with MegaDerm(®) (sheet-type and pellet-type), analyzing false positives and recurrences, using multi-modality images. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study included 201 women (age range: 28-81 years, mean age ± standard deviation: 53.2 ± 8.6 years) who underwent breast-conserving surgery and immediate reconstruction with MegaDerm(®). Post-surgery, each patient underwent at least one mammography (MG), ultrasonography (US), and MRI, totaling 713 MG, 1063 US, and 607 MRI examinations. Postoperative images were reviewed separately for the two types of MegaDerm(®), and suspicious imaging findings (false positives and recurrences) were analyzed, with a particular focus on the findings in direct contact with MegaDerm(®). RESULTS: MegaDerm(®) appeared as a circumscribed mass with homogeneous iso- or high density on MG, posterior shadowing on US, and no enhancement on MRI. Calcification was more common and increased in size in sheet-type MegaDerm(®), while pellet-type often exhibited irregular margins. Nine out of 17 false positives had suspicious findings in direct contact with MegaDerm(®), and six out of nine recurrences showed similar findings. Common suspicious findings included calcifications, asymmetries, and MegaDerm(®) irregularities on MG; masses and MegaDerm(®) irregularities on US; and enhancing masses and MegaDerm(®) irregularities with enhancement on MRI. Notably, MegaDerm(®) irregularity with calcification was observed on MG and US in only one recurrence case. In 44.4% (4/9) of false-positives in direct contact with MegaDerm(®), suspicious findings showed no change or resolution on follow-up. CONCLUSION: Suspicious imaging findings in direct contact with MegaDerm(®) may be associated with false positives or recurrences. Therefore, it is essential to recognize these characteristic findings and review the patient's history of MegaDerm(®) insertion when in doubt.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。