Abstract
In the field of orthopedics and trauma surgery, the rise of periprosthetic joint infections following joint replacement and fracture-related infections (FRI) has become a growing concern. The recent establishment of a definitive definition for FRI aimed to standardize diagnosis and treatment approaches while considering unique aspects of implant-associated infections in the presence of concomitant bone fractures. Diagnosing FRI can be challenging due to the varied clinical symptoms, and confirmatory criteria may not always be evident, necessitating additional diagnostic measures. Blood markers like leukocyte count, C-reactive protein (CRP), and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) have limited specificity. Although novel biomarkers such as D-dimer and interleukin-6 (IL-6) show potential, they require further investigation. The use of microbiological diagnostics with tissue samples and sonication has improved pathogen detection. Cross-sectional imaging techniques like CT scans and MRI scans help evaluate bone status, soft tissue infiltration, and abscesses. Nuclear medicine techniques are accurate but may not always be practical in routine clinical practice. Histopathological interpretation for FRI remains less standardized compared to periprosthetic joint infections (PJI). FRI diagnosis requires the identification of visible microorganisms in deep tissue specimens and the quantification of polymorphonuclear neutrophils (PMNs). The defined concept of FRI has opened doors for better diagnostic and treatment approaches. However, challenges persist, especially in preoperative diagnosis, particularly for cases with unclear clinical presentations. Future endeavors aimed at optimizing diagnostic procedures and establishing a histopathological classification for FRI could lead to improved treatment recommendations and outcomes.