Abstract
BACKGROUND: Despite long clinical experience some authorities recommend against the use of aspirin for perioperative VTE prophylaxis and favour alternatives such as dabigatran. A change from Dabigatran to an Aspirin based protocol in a British district general hospital created the conditions of a natural experiment. METHODS: We conducted a single centre, retrospective study of 6-months using a dabigatran based protocol (THA n = 191, TKA n = 155) and 6-months using and aspirin based protocol (THA n = 165, TKA n = 136). Outcomes addressed include: VTE used, VTE events within 90-days, 30-day return to theatre (RTT) rates, and 90-day mortality. RESULTS: Pre-intervention, the dabigatran prescription rate was 73% (n = 139) and 78% (n = 123) with aspirin prescription post-intervention in 67% (n = 110) and 70% (n = 90) for THA and TKA respectively. We found a similar VTE rate when comparing dabigatran and aspirin groups for THA (2.2% vs. 0%, p = 0.17) and TKA (0.64% vs. 0%, p = 0.32). Similarly, no difference in the RTT rate was seen for THA (0.7% vs.2.7%, p = 0.23) or TKA (1.6% vs. 3.2%, p = 0.38). CONCLUSION: No significant differences in safety were found comparing aspirin to dabigatran for VTE prophylaxis for lower limb arthroplasty which, has not been previously reported and represents significant cost saving implications.