Arthroscopic fixation versus open reduction and internal fixation for displaced tibial side posterior cruciate ligament avulsion fractures: A systematic review and meta-analysis

关节镜下固定术与开放复位内固定术治疗移位性胫骨侧后交叉韧带撕脱骨折的疗效比较:系统评价和荟萃分析

阅读:1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The reported incidence of the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) injury ranges from 3 to 23 % of all knee injuries. Several injury patterns of the PCL have been described, including intra-substance, femoral detachment, and tibial avulsion, of which the last two are more common. Displaced PCL avulsion injury from the tibial side requires surgical fixation; however, there is no consensus in the literature regarding the optimal surgical approach for the fixation of these injuries. PURPOSE: To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the outcomes and complications of arthroscopic and open fixation of displaced tibial side PCL avulsion fractures. METHODS: We performed a primary electronic search across PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases and looked for comparative studies that evaluated and compared the outcomes of arthroscopic versus open reduction and fixation of displaced tibial side PCL avulsion fractures. Statistical analyses were executed with the software RevMan-5.4.1. RESULTS: This meta-analysis included two RCTs, one prospective and seven retrospective comparative studies. Evaluation across all ten studies suggested no statistically significant difference for arthroscopic versus open fixation in terms of postoperative International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score (MD 4.43 [-0.73, 9.42; p = 0.09]), Lysholm score (MD 2.69 [-1.07,6.45; p = 0.16], knee range of motion (ROM) (MD -1.08 [-2.80,0.63; p = 0.21]), complications (OR1.75 [0.86, 3.54; P = 0.12]), Tegner activity (MD 0.14 [-0.46,0.74; p = 0.64]), posterior tibial translation (PTT) (MD -0.60 [-1.51,0.31; p = 0.20, posterior drawer test (PDT), operating time (MD 12.03 [-0.47, 24.53; p = 0.06]), and length of hospital stay. The fracture union rate was 98.77 % in the arthroscopic group and 100 % in the open fixation group, with comparable union time. There is a significantly lesser amount of blood loss in the arthroscopic group compared to the open group. CONCLUSION: Current evidence shows comparable outcomes and complications for tibial side PCL avulsion fracture fixation through arthroscopic or open methods.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。