Comparison between femoral nerve block and pericapsular nerve group block as preemptive analgesia in geriatric intertrochanteric fractures: A prospective randomised controlled clinical trial

比较股神经阻滞与关节囊周围神经群阻滞作为老年股骨粗隆间骨折预防性镇痛的疗效:一项前瞻性随机对照临床试验

阅读:1

Abstract

PURPOSE: Regional blocks such as femoral nerve block (FNB) and Pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block are frequently used for postoperative pain relief in fractures around the hip joint. This study compares the analgesic efficacy of PENG block with FNB in the management of intertrochanteric fractures. METHODS: This randomised controlled clinical trial included patients aged 65-80 years with intertrochanteric fractures who were planned for closed reduction and cephalomedullary nailing. The patients were randomised into two groups: Group 1 (n = 40) received FNB, while Group 2 (n = 40) received PENG block preoperatively. The outcome measures were postoperative VAS score, total opioid consumption, quadriceps power, and duration of mobilisation. RESULTS: There was a significant reduction in postoperative pain in both groups. A comparison between the FNB and PENG blocks showed no significant difference in VAS scores at 6, 12, 18, 24, 36, and 48 h. The PENG group had better quadriceps strength preservation at 12 h (p < 0.05), with no significant difference between the two groups at 60 h. The total opioid consumption in the first 48 h was similar in both groups (8.03 Morphine milliequivalents (MME) in PENG and 7.07 MME in the FNB group, p-value >0.05). CONCLUSION: PENG block and FNB are equally effective in pain relief and in reducing opioid requirements in elderly patients with intertrochanteric fractures. However, the PENG group showed better preservation of quadriceps strength at 12 h.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。