Neoadjuvant transcatheter arterial chemoembolization does not provide survival benefit compared to curative therapy alone in single hepatocellular carcinoma

对于单发肝细胞癌,新辅助经导管动脉化疗栓塞术与单纯根治性治疗相比,并不能带来生存获益。

阅读:1

Abstract

The role of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) prior to curative therapy is still unclear. The aim of our study was to elucidate the survival of single hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and also to clarify whether TACE plus sequential curative therapy provides benefits in single HCC. A total of 470 patients with a diagnosis of single HCC between 2005 and 2010 were studied. The factors associated with clinical outcomes were analyzed. The outcomes between patients who underwent neoadjuvant TACE and those who did not were also compared. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival (OS) rates of all patients were 92.6%, 73.3%, and 59.6%, respectively. Child-Pugh class A [HR: 2.04, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.277-3.254, p = 0.003], very early stage Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) (HR: 2.03, 95% CI: 1.021-4.025, p = 0.043), tumor size < 5 cm (HR: 1.75, 95% CI: 1.115-2.751, p = 0.015), alpha fetoprotein (AFP) level < 200 ng/mL (HR: 2.07, 95% CI: 1.346-3.182, p = 0.001), and curative-based therapy (HR: 2.16, 95% CI: 1.442-3.224, p < 0.001) were factors associated with better OS. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) rates of all the patients were 75.4%, 53.7%, and 36.3%, respectively. Only Child-Pugh class A (HR: 1.57, 95% CI: 1.068-2.294, p = 0.022) and curative-based therapy (HR: 1.51, 95% CI: 1.128-2.028, p = 0.006) were significantly associated with better DFS. Neoadjuvant TACE did not provide benefit compared with curative therapy alone in subgroup analysis. In conclusion, neoadjuvant TACE is not recommended in single HCC patients who may indicate for curative therapy.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。