Clinical Bedside Tools to Assess Systemic Sclerosis Vasculopathy: Can Digital Thermal Monitoring and Sublingual Microscopy Identify Patients With Digital Ulcers?

临床床旁工具在评估系统性硬化症血管病变中的应用:数字热监测和舌下显微镜检查能否识别患有指端溃疡的患者?

阅读:1

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Sublingual microscopy assesses systemic sclerosis (SSc) vasculopathy. Digital thermal monitoring (DTM) may identify patients at risk for digital ulcer (DU). The purpose of this analysis was to assess sublingual microscopy and DTM in SSc patients with and without previous DU in order to determine the utility of these clinical tools. METHODS: SSc registry patients with clinical data who had both DTM and sublingual microscopy on the same day were included in this cross-sectional analysis. DTM quantifies vascular reactivity index (VRI). Sublingual microscopy measures longitudinal red blood cell fraction (RBCfract) and perfused boundary region (PBR). We evaluated the pairwise association between VRI, RBCfract, and PBR in a monotonic relationship using Spearman rank correlation in the DU subset. Correlation coefficients (r ((s)) ) and their 95% CIs were reported. RESULTS: Ninety patients were included; 29 had digital pits and/or active DU and 61 never had a DU. The only significant clinical feature associated with DU was modified Rodnan skin score (P = 0.003) with DU being higher. The VRI was lower in patients with DU (P = 0.01). The higher the RBCfract, the lower PBR (r ((s)) = -0.71, 95% CI -0.86 to -0.47, P < 0.001). VRI was not associated with RBCfract or PBR (P = 0.24 or 0.55, respectively) in the patients with DU. CONCLUSION: DTM is a useful tool for assessing SSc-DU. While sublingual microscopy measurements did not significantly correlate to VRI in patients with SSc-DU, a longitudinal study may be more helpful in capturing vasculopathy activity prior to possible irreversible damage.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。