Abstract
1. Mouse cortical wedge preparations were used in order to study the effects of metabotropic glutamate receptor (mGluR) agonists and antagonists on the depolarization induced by N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) or by (S)-alpha-amino-4-bromo-3-hydroxy-5-isoxazolepropionic acid (AMPA). 2. (1S,3R)-1-aminocyclopentane-1,3-dicarboxylic acid (1S,3R-ACPD) (30-300 microM) significantly potentiated the depolarizations induced by NMDA, leaving unchanged those mediated by AMPA. This potentiation developed slowly and lasted for up to 60 min provided that the slices were continuously perfused with the mGluR agonist. 3. Concentration-response curves to NMDA in the absence and in the presence of 1S,3R-ACPD (100 microM) indicated that the potentiation was due to increased affinity of the NMDA receptor complex for its agonist. The maximal responses to NMDA were not potentiated. 4. Selective agonists of group 1 mGluR such as quisqualate (Quis) (30 microM) or (RS)-3,5-dihydroxyphenylglycine (DHPG) (300 microM) did not potentiate NMDA responses. Similarly, selective agonists of group 2 mGluRs, such as (2S,3S,4S)-alpha-carboxycyclopropyl-glycine (L-CCG-I) (3-30 microM), and of group 3, such as L-2-amino-4-phosphonobutyric acid (L-AP4) (100 microM) were inactive in our test. A number of other putative mGluR agents having partial agonist activity on mGluRs in brain slices and in expression systems, such as 1R,3S-ACPD (500 microM), DL-2-amino-3-phosphonopropionic acid (DL-AP3) (300 microM) and (S)-4-carboxy-3-hydroxyphenylglycine (S-4C3HPG; 500 microM), when placed in the experimental protocol we used, did not change NMDA responses. 5. Available mGluR antagonists, such as DL-AP3 (1 mM), (+)-alpha-methyl-4-carboxyphenylglycine (MCPG) (500 microM), S-4-carboxyphenylglycine (4CPG; 500 microM) and S-4-carboxy-3-hydroxyphenylglycine (S-4C3HPG; 500 microM), did not reduce 1S,3R-ACPD potentiation of NMDA responses. 6. It is concluded that the potentiation of NMDA currents induced by the mGluR agonist 1S,3R-ACPD, in mouse cortical wedges, has a pharmacological profile which is different from that of the three mGluR groups so far described in expression systems.