Abstract
Immunohistochemistry (IHC) is the gold standard for diagnosing (positive vs. negative) polyomavirus BK (BKV) nephropathy and has the potential for disease staging based on staining intensity and quantification of infected cells. This multicenter trial evaluated the reproducibility of BKV IHC among 81 pathologists at 60 institutions. Participants stained tissue microarray slides and scored them for staining intensity and percentage of positive nuclei. Staining protocol details and evaluation scores were collected online. Slides were returned for centralized panel re-evaluation and kappa statistics were calculated. Individual assessment of staining intensity and percentage was more reproducible than combined scoring. Inter-institutional reproducibility was moderate for staining intensity (κ = 0.49) and percentage (κ = 0.42), fair for combined (κ = 0.25) and best for simple positive/negative scoring (κ = 0.78). Inter-observer reproducibility was substantial for intensity (κ = 0.74), percentage (κ = 0.66), positive/negative (κ = 0.78) and moderate for combined scoring (κ = 0.43). Inter-laboratory reproducibility was fair for intensity (κ = 0.37), percentage (κ = 0.40) and combined (κ = 0.24), but substantial for positive/negative scoring (κ = 0.67). BKV RNA copies/cell correlated with staining intensity (r = 0.56) and percentage (r = 0.62). These results indicate that BKV IHC is reproducible between observers but scoring should be simplified to a single-feature schema. Standardization of tissue processing and staining protocols would further improve inter-laboratory reproducibility.