Comparison of a Multiplex Real-Time PCR Technique with Oxford Nanopore Technologies Next-Generation Sequencing for Identification of SARS-CoV-2 Variants of Concern

多重实时PCR技术与牛津纳米孔技术下一代测序技术在识别SARS-CoV-2关注变异株方面的比较

阅读:1

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The rapid emergence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) variants and their potential to endangering the global health has increased the demand for a fast-tracking method in comparison to the next-generation sequencing (NGS) as a gold standard assay, particularly in developing countries. This study was designed to evaluate the performance of a commercial multiplex real-time PCR technique (GA SARS-CoV-2 OneStep RT-PCR Kit, Iran) for identification of SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern (VOCs) compared to the Oxford Nanopore NGS assay. METHODS: A total of 238 SARS-CoV-2-positive respiratory samples from different waves of COVID-19 in Iran were randomly selected in this study. To determine the SARS-CoV-2 VOC, the samples were analyzed via the commercial triple target assay, GA SARS-CoV-2 OneStep RT-PCR Kit, and NGS as well. RESULTS: The results revealed good concordance between GA SARS-CoV-2 OneStep RT-PCR Kit and NGS for identification of SARS-CoV-2 VOCs. GA SARS-CoV-2 OneStep RT-PCR Kit identified Wuhan, Alpha, and Delta variants with 100% relative sensitivity and specificity. Regarding Omicron subvariants of BA.1, BA.2, and BA.4/5, the relative sensitivity of 100%, 100%, and 81.5% and the relative specificity of 95.3%, 93.5%, and 100% were observed. CONCLUSION: Overall, GA SARS-CoV-2 OneStep RT-PCR Kit can be used as a rapid and cost-effective alternative to NGS for identification of SARS-CoV-2 VOCs.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。