Treatment of obstructive sleep apnea with CPAP improves chronic inflammation measured by neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio

使用持续气道正压通气(CPAP)治疗阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停可改善中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值所测量的慢性炎症。

阅读:2

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVES: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is associated with chronic inflammation likely triggered by nocturnal, intermittent hypoxemia and increased adrenergic tone. The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) was recently described as a measure of subclinical systemic inflammation. Studies on the effect of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy in OSA on subclinical inflammation measured by NLR are lacking. We hypothesize that NLR levels would improve as chronic inflammation diminishes in patients with OSA treated with CPAP. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients in whom OSA was diagnosed and who were treated with CPAP therapy. Complete blood count (CBC) were obtained pretreatment and posttreatment for calculation of NLR, which was calculated by dividing the number of neutrophils by the number of lymphocytes. Patients with conditions known to affect NLR such as chronic infections, inflammatory diseases, active cardiovascular disease, and malignancies were excluded from the study. CPAP adherence downloads were obtained for all patients. RESULTS: Out of 184 patients in whom OSA was diagnosed and who were treated with CPAP, 109 met our study criteria, including baseline polysomnogram, baseline and posttreatment CBC, and available adherence download. We compared the NLR before and after treatment with CPAP. There was a significant difference in NLR before and after treatment with CPAP (P < .0001). There was also a significant difference in apnea-hypopnea index before and after treatment (P < .0001). We also assessed the relationship between CPAP adherence (percentage of days used for > 4 hours) and the change in NLR. NLR decreased significantly in both the adherent (CPAP use ≥ 70% of days; P = .014) and nonadherent groups (CPAP use < 70% of days; P = .0003). Finally, we noticed a significant direct correlation between CPAP adherence beyond 70% and the change in NLR (ΔNLR) (P = .046) in patients who had ≥ 70% adherence with CPAP, which was not observed in patients with < 70% adherence. CONCLUSIONS: The NLR may be a useful marker for monitoring improvement, as CPAP had a desirable effect on the chronic inflammation induced by OSA when measured by NLR in this study. Our results specifically suggest that the NLR values decrease significantly in patients using CPAP regardless of adherence, but with a more direct relationship in those who use it beyond 70% of days, at least 4 hours a day.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。