Abstract
Interstitial fluid, owing to its similarity to blood components and higher sensitivity and specificity, finds widespread application in disease diagnosis and tumor marker detection. However, collecting interstitial fluid, particularly from the deep subcutaneous connective tissue, remains challenging.•This study aimed to compare three different collection methods - push-pull perfusion, multi-filament nylon thread implantation, and tissue centrifugation - for collecting interstitial fluid from the subcutaneous connective tissue layer of mini-pigs. High-performance ion chromatography was employed to analyze the conventional cation components in the samples and compare ion composition analysis between the different methods.•Results indicated that while the distribution of conventional cations in the interstitial fluid collected by the three methods was generally consistent, there were slight variations in the detection rates and concentrations of different ions. Hence, suitable collection methods should be selected based on the ions or collection sites of interest.