Conclusion
TFRC may be a potential prognostic biomarker and an immunotherapeutic target for glioma.
Methods
Clinical pathological information and gene expression data of patients with LGG come from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), Chinese Glioma Genome Atlas (CGGA), GTEx, Oncomine, UCSC Xena, and GEO databases. We then used various bioinformatics methods and mathematical models to analyze those data, aiming to investigate the clinical significance of TFRC in LGG and illustrate its association with tumor immunity. In addition, the molecular function and mechanisms of TFRC were revealed by gene ontology (GO), Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG), and gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA). Immunohistochemical experiments and single-cell analysis have been performed.
Results
TFRC expression was highly expressed in many tumors and showed a poor prognosis. Including gliomas, it was significantly associated with several poor clinical prognostic variables, tumor immune microenvironment, tumor mutational burden (TMB), m6a modification, and ferroptosis in LGG. TFRC as a key factor was further used to build a prediction nomogram. The C-index, calibration curve, and decision curve analysis showed the nomogram was clinically useful and calibration was accurate. At the same time, we also demonstrated that promoter hypomethylation of DNA upstream of TFRC could lead to high TFRC expression and poor overall survival. There is a significant correlation between TFRC and CD8 + T cell, macrophage cell infiltration, and several immune checkpoints, such as PD-L1(cd274), CTLA4, and PD1, suggesting a novel direction for future clinical application. Functional and molecular mechanism analysis showed an association of TFRC expression with immune-related pathways through GSEA, GO, and KEGG analysis. Finally, immunohistochemical experiments and single-cell analysis confirmed the expression of TFRC in glioma.