A systematical procedure to extracting legal entities from Indonesian judicial decisions

从印尼司法判决中提取法律实体的系统程序

阅读:2

Abstract

This article presents a systematic method of extracting legal entities from Indonesian judicial decisions with a well-structured named entity recognition (NER) approach. The procedure was implemented by gathering and annotating court decisions for theft cases at three court levels: first instance (2478 files), appeal (147 files), and cassation (62 files), amounting to 2687 annotated files. The data were harvested from the official website of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia using automated web scraping, followed by manual filtering for relevance and completeness. Manual annotation was performed with the Label Studio platform by three independent annotators. Annotation consistency was considered using Fleiss' Kappa, yielding an average agreement score of 0.705 across all levels, indicating good inter-annotator reliability. The method uses a hierarchical structure and a BIO tagging scheme to tag >50 types of legal entities, including defendants, judges, legal articles, charges, and verdict decisions. This approach is proper for text processes such as legal information extraction, classification, and legal analysis. From a legal perspective, this process will improve legal transparency and research on Indonesian judicial data.•Structured pipeline for gathering, filtering, and annotating Indonesian court judgments based on legal metadata and web scraping.•Manual annotation of 2687 court documents with annotation rules and inter-annotator agreement using Fleiss' Kappa.•Token-level translation and BIO tagging for >50 legal entities, enabling downstream NLP tasks such as named entity recognition.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。