Abstract
Participatory mapping is increasingly used to map spatial variation in people's perceptions about ecosystem services. It has growing use in the identification of locations where places perceived to be important converge. Few recommendations have been published to navigate decisions about sampling effort in participatory mapping research when polygon data is collected, although one recommendation is for ≥ 25 participants assuming each participant maps c. 4-5 polygons per ecosystem service. Underlying data informing this recommendation reflects a particular context: collected using postal questionnaires to map a vast spatial area in southern Australia. Although not intended as definitive or suited to all contexts, the 25 participant (or 100-125 polygon) minimum sometimes informs participatory mapping research. Our empirical work, undertaken using face-to-face questionnaires in a small Vietnamese coastal study area, suggests the recommendation may not be appropriate in all contexts. We propose a modified stepwise approach which:•Prioritises spatial agreement (polygon overlap) rather than polygon count and participant numbers to assess data sufficiency•Uses narratives to triangulate outputs generated from participatory mapping data to reduce uncertainty related to low polygon counts.