Abstract
BACKGROUND: A randomized controlled trial was designed to compare 1-year morphologic changes of the no-touch saphenous vein (SV) as a Y-composite graft (composite group) vs an aortocoronary graft (aorta group) in coronary artery bypass grafting. This study evaluated early clinical and angiographic outcomes as a preliminary analysis. METHODS: The primary end point of the trial was the intima-media thickness measured by intravascular ultrasound at 1-year angiographic follow-up. Patients were screened to enroll 25 patients in each group based on a superiority design. Early postoperative clinical and angiographic outcomes were compared between the 2 groups. RESULTS: The numbers of distal anastomoses per SV graft were 2.7 ± 1.1 and 2.6 ± 0.8 in the composite and aorta groups, respectively. There was no operative death, and postoperative complications in the 2 groups did not significantly differ. All patients underwent early postoperative graft angiography at a median of 1 (interquartile range, 1-1) day after operation. Early angiographic patency rates were 98.9% (93/94 anastomoses) and 100% (90/90 anastomoses) in the composite and aorta groups, respectively. There was no distal anastomosis showing competitive flow in the aorta group, whereas 3 anastomoses with competitive flow were found in the composite group. All 3 anastomoses with competitive flow were SV grafts that were anastomosed to the right coronary artery territory with moderate stenosis. CONCLUSIONS: Early clinical outcomes and angiographic graft patency rates were not significantly different with use of no-touch SV as a Y-composite graft or an aortocoronary graft.