Abstract
Neoadjuvant therapy followed by radical surgery is standard for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). However, compared to younger patients, elderly patients often had multiple commodities and may refuse surgery due to being medically unfit or the high risk of operative mortality. This study aims to explore the effects of surgery on short- and long-term mortality in elderly LARC patients using a nationwide cancer registry. The cohort included 6211 patients aged over 65, with 2556 matched through propensity scoring for comparison between surgery (N = 1704) and non-surgery (N = 852) groups. The Cox proportional hazard model compared mortality between these groups. Our results showed that the elderly LARC patients who underwent surgery were more likely to be younger (65-75 years), have clinically-positive lymph nodes, and no comorbidities. Surgery was associated with significantly lower 3-month, 6-month, and 5-year mortality rates, with a greater absolute survival benefit (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 4.78; 95% CI, 2.71-8.43; aHR, 4.50; 95% CI, 3.07-6.58 and aHR, 3.81; 95% CI, 3.21-4.51). In stratified analysis, surgery remains provide significantly survival benefit according different age, gender and clinical classification. Furthermore, among non-surgical patients, those receiving chemoradiation had better survival outcomes compared to those receiving radiation, chemotherapy, or no treatment (all P < 0.001). This study highlights the survival advantage of surgery in elderly LARC patients and offers valuable guidance for clinical decision-making.