Abstract
BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVES: Iron-deficiency anaemia (IDA) is a common nutritional deficiency among pregnant women in India. It has a significant impact on the health of the mother as well as that of the foetus. IDA generally responds well to treatment with oral iron supplementation. However, oral iron supplements are toxic to the gastrointestinal mucosa and intolerance is common, resulting in poor compliance and failure of treatment. The iron salts such as iron hydroxide polymaltose complex (IPC) and ferrous ascorbate (FeA) are claimed to have low gastrointestinal intolerance, therefore better patient compliance than the conventionally used ferrous sulphate (FS). These preparations also claim to increase haemoglobin level faster as well as improve the iron storage better than FS. This study was done to compare the efficacy and safety of FS with IPC and FeA. METHODS: It was a randomized, parallel, open label, study among pregnant women of gestational age between 12 to 26 wk with moderate anaemia. Patients were randomly allocated to receive either FS, IPC or FeA. They were then followed up for 90 days to observe for improvement in the haemoglobin levels and other haematological parameters or any adverse drug reaction. RESULTS: The haemoglobin levels were comparable in the three groups except at day 90 when FeA group had significantly higher haemoglobin level as compared to FS group (P<0.05). The overall adverse effect profiles were also comparable among the study groups except epigastric pain which was more commonly reported in the FS group. INTERPRETATION & CONCLUSIONS: The results of the study showed that FS, IPC and FeA have comparable efficacy and safety profile in the treatment of IDA of pregnancy.