Gait differences after ACL reconstruction versus healthy controls: a three-level meta-analysis of kinematics, kinetics, and spatiotemporal parameters

前交叉韧带重建术后与健康对照组步态差异:运动学、动力学和时空参数的三级荟萃分析

阅读:1

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This meta-analysis was designed to evaluate whether individuals following ACL reconstruction exhibit normalized gait biomechanics when compared to healthy controls. METHODS: This review was conducted across five databases: PubMed, Embase, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science and EBSCOhost-SportDiscus, yielding a total of 5,251 records, with 21 qualified studies (52 independent samples from 861 participants; based on available data, the mean age was 26.5 ± 4.3 years and 51.3% were female) eligible for quantitative synthesis following rigorous screening. A three-level meta-analysis model was implemented to address effect size dependencies. Six gait parameters were analyzed, including kinematic variables (peak knee flexion and extension angles during stance), kinetic variables (peak external knee flexion and extension moments during stance) and spatiotemporal variables (stride length and walking speed). RESULTS: Among the six gait parameters that were analyzed, only the peak knee extension angle during stance (k = 9, d = 0.83, 95% CI: 0.26-1.40, I(2) = 77.53%, p = 0.01) showed a significant difference between ACL reconstruction patients and healthy controls. However, peak knee flexion angle, peak external knee flexion and extension moments during stance, stride length and walking speed were not significantly different between groups (p > 0.05). Meta-regression identified a significant time-dependent improvement only for knee extension angle (F = 5.656, p = 0.049), while postoperative duration had no significant effect on other outcomes. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis shows that the majority of gait parameters during stance, including peak knee flexion angle, external knee flexion and extension moments, stride length and walking speed, do not differ significantly between individuals with ACL reconstruction and healthy controls. Only peak knee extension angle remained impaired, though it showed signs of improvement over time. Persistent knee extension deficits emphasize the need for targeted quadriceps and knee control training as a key focus for long-term ACLR rehabilitation.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。