Abstract
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to estimate the clinical efficacy and identify the best beneficiaries of postoperative adjuvant transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (PA-TACE) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 749 HCC patients who underwent surgical resection (380 underwent PA-TACE, 369 had resection only) with a high risk of recurrence were reviewed retrospectively. Patients receiving PA-TACE were randomly split into development and validation cohorts. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed in the development cohort. A novel model for PA-TACE-insensitivity prediction was built based on univariate and multivariate analysis and was multi-dimensionally validated in the validation set and all samples. RESULTS: After propensity score matching (PSM), in the early-recurrence group, no significant improvement in RFS was achieved with PA-TACE compared to radical hepatic resection alone. PA-TACE insensitive patients were considered as the PA-TACE non-benefit population and were associated with six clinicopathological factors: AFP, node number, tumor capsule, Ki-67 index, MVI, and complications in the development cohort. These factors were incorporated into a nomogram model, which reliably predicted PA-TACE insensitivity, with concordance indices of 0.874 and 0.897 for the development and validation cohort, respectively. In the overall sample, PA-TACE did not significantly improve patients' RFS and OS in the high-score group, while the low-score group had statistical significance. Recurrence pattern diversity was also found to be a factor leading to PA-TACE insensitivity. CONCLUSION: We constructed a new PA-TACE-insensitivity prediction model with potential clinical value. The good predictive performance and availability would allow this model to effectively screen PA-TACE beneficiaries.KEY MESSAGESThe independent influencing factors of PA-TACE insensitivity in patients who received PA-TACE were analyzed to construct a predictive model and its clinical application performance was verified with multi-dimensional methods.PA-TACE treatment should be avoided for patients with high scores according to this model, while it should be cautiously recommended for patients with low scores after multiple considerations.Compared with other related models, this model has obvious advantages in versatility and effectiveness. It can effectively screen the best benefit population of PA-TACE and provide a reliable reference for the selection of precise treatment plans for patients after radical resection of hepatocellular carcinoma.