Comparative Detection and Inter-Modality Agreement of Pulp Stones Using Digital Periapical Radiography and CBCT at Two Voxel Sizes: An Ex Vivo Study

两种体素尺寸下,数字根尖周X线片和锥形束CT对牙髓结石的检测及成像一致性比较:一项离体研究

阅读:1

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Pulp stones are calcified masses within the dental pulp that may complicate endodontic procedures. Although cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) has been reported to detect pulp stones more frequently than two-dimensional radiography, direct comparisons between digital periapical radiography (DPR) and CBCT, particularly at different voxel sizes, remain limited. This study aimed to compare pulp stone detection rates between DPR and CBCT acquired at two voxel sizes and to evaluate inter-modality agreement using a location-based analysis for pulp stone identification in extracted teeth. Methods: Fifty-two extracted human teeth were examined using DPR and CBCT at voxel sizes of 0.2 mm and 0.1 mm under standardized ex vivo conditions. Pulp stones were evaluated in the coronal and radicular regions using a binary scoring system (presence/absence). Detection rates were compared across imaging modalities, and inter-modality agreement was evaluated using McNemar's test in the analysis stratified by pulp stone location. Associations between pulp stone detection and age, gender, tooth status, and stone location were explored using chi-square tests. Results: CBCT at 0.1 mm demonstrated the highest detection rate for pulp stones (63.5%), followed by CBCT at 0.2 mm (57.7%) and DPR (50%), with no statistically significant differences among modalities (p > 0.05). Agreement analysis showed that CBCT at 0.2 mm had higher agreement with CBCT at 0.1 mm than DPR, particularly in the coronal region, whereas DPR showed lower agreement in the radicular region. No significant associations were observed between pulp stone detection and age, gender, or tooth status. Conclusions: Under standardized ex vivo conditions, CBCT showed numerically higher pulp stone detection rates than DPR. Location-based agreement analysis indicated greater consistency between CBCT voxel sizes than between CBCT and DPR, particularly in the radicular region. These findings highlight differences in pulp stone detectability across imaging modalities and voxel resolutions and may help explain variability in radiographic detection under controlled conditions.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。