Effect of dexmedetomidine-assisted ultrasound-guided lower extremity nerve block on postoperative cognitive function in elderly patients undergoing hip surgery

右美托咪啶辅助超声引导下肢神经阻滞对老年髋部手术患者术后认知功能的影响

阅读:7
作者:Tongsheng Xu, Xiaodong Chen, Xin Li, Mingzhu Wang, Meng Wang

Conclusion

Dex-assisted ultrasound-guided lower extremity nerve block can effectively inhibit the postoperative inflammation, improve the cognitive function, and benefit the postoperative rehabilitation in elderly patients undergoing THA.

Methods

This retrospective study analyzed data of 60 elderly patients treated with unilateral artificial THA from January 2021 to February 2022. Among them, 30 patients anesthetized using Dex-assisted ultrasound-guided lower extremity nerve block were regarded as the research group (RG), and 30 patients anesthetized with the use of subarachnoid block were considered as the control group (CG). Serum interleukin 6 (IL-6) and interleukin 1β (IL-1β) levels were measured by enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (Elisa) in patients. Also, the heart rate (HR) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) were measured before, 10 min and 60 min after the anesthesia. The cognitive function was evaluated before anesthesia, as well as 2 h, 6 h and 36 h after anesthesia. The adverse reactions during hospitalization were recorded, and the incidence of adverse reactions was calculated.

Objective

To investigate the effect of dexmedetomidine (Dex)-assisted ultrasound-guided lower extremity nerve block on elderly patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA).

Results

IL-1β and IL-6 levels in both groups after operation were higher than those before operation (P>0.05), but those in the RG were lower than those in the CG (P<0.05). The HR and MAP at 10 min after anesthesia were lower than those before anesthesia (P<0.05). After anesthesia, the HR and MAP at 60 min in the RG were higher than those at 10 min in the CG, while the two in the RG were lower than those in the CG at 60 min (P<0.05). In addition, the postoperative pain score of the RG was lower than that of the CG, while the cognitive score of the RG was higher than that of the CG (P<0.05). There was no marked difference in the incidence of adverse reactions between the two groups (P>0.05).

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。