[Assessment of Dimensionality and Structural Stability of Pre-service Science Teachers' Ability to Engage in Reflections]

[职前科学教师反思能力的维度和结构稳定性评估]

阅读:1

Abstract

This study examines the reflective ability-the ability to reflect with quality on a lesson's aspects-of pre-service students teachers. The present study pursues a subject-specific focus in the natural sciences, as there have been only a few such studies to this date. To this end, the students conduct two different 90 min lessons, each featuring distinct experiments from the fields of biology and chemistry, but with the identical learning objective of scientific experimentation as a method of acquiring knowledge. Subsequent to the lesson, the students engage in subject-specific reflection on the lessons. It is determined whether the structure of the subject-specific reflection ability can be consistently recorded and to what extent this structure is stable over multiple teaching situations. In addition, the study examines which dimensionality is empirically identifiable. A total of 61 pre-service science teachers in the integrative subject of science and technology at lower secondary level were examined. A standardized instrument was developed to measure the breadth and depth of reflection. It comprises 17 items that focus on subject-specific aspects of reflection. Data was collected through semi-structured guided interviews, which were analyzed using qualitative content analysis. The analysis of the structure suggests a one-dimensional construct for the ability to engage in subject-specific reflection. Multidimensional models based in theory are not supported by the data. This one-dimensional structure can be identified in a comparable manner in both experimental situations. The findings indicate a structural stability of the measured ability across both reflection occasions. The results are discussed against the background that, despite the survey's rigorous control, the volatility of such teaching situations poses a major methodological challenge for measuring reflection. This raises the question of how many teaching situations would be necessary for a valid and reliable assessment of the ability to engage in subject-specific reflection.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。