Practical Application of ERAS Protocols in Older Adults with Hepatocellular Carcinoma Undergoing Hepatectomy: A Propensity Score Matching Study

ERAS方案在接受肝切除术的老年肝细胞癌患者中的实际应用:一项倾向评分匹配研究

阅读:2

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: This retrospective observational study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols in older adult patients (≥65 years) with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) undergoing radical hepatectomy. METHODS: In this retrospective observational study, 498 patients who underwent radical resection for HCC between January 2018 and December 2023 were included and divided into four groups: Older adult ERAS (OE Group, n=60), Younger adult ERAS (YE Group, n=148), Older adult non-ERAS (ONE Group, n=88), and Younger adult non-ERAS (YNE Group, n=202). Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to balance baseline covariates, generating three pairwise matched cohorts: PSM-OE Group 1 vs PSM-YE Group (both n=37), PSM-OE Group 2 vs PSM-ONE Group (both n=53), and PSM-OE Group 3 vs PSM-YNE Group (both n=35). Short-term postoperative outcomes were compared across groups. RESULTS: Results showed that postoperative pain control was significantly superior in PSM-OE Group 1 compared to PSM-YE Group (91.9% vs 70.3% pain-free, p=0.018) and in PSM-OE Group 2 compared to PSM-ONE Group (90.6% vs 69.8% pain-free, 7.328, p=0.013), with no significant difference between PSM-OE Group 3 and PSM-YNE Group (85.7% vs 74.3%, p=0.319). PSM-OE Group 2 had significantly shorter length of hospital stays (LOS: 13.17±4.71 vs 16.68±6.42 days, p=0.002) and length of postoperative stays (LPS: 6.94±3.26 vs 9.64±5.02 days, p=0.001) than PSM-ONE Group, while PSM-OE Group 3 also showed shorter LOS (13.31±4.74 vs 17.34±9.75 days, p=0.031) and LPS (7.26±3.53 vs 10.49±6.58 days, p=0.013) compared to PSM-YNE Group. The complication rate was notably lower in PSM-OE Group 2 than PSM-ONE Group (χ(2)=13.747, p=0.001), with no significant differences in complication rates between other matched pairs. Blood transfusion rates, average hospitalization costs, liver reserve function (assessed by PALBI score), and 30-day readmission rates (p=0.700) showed no significant differences across all matched cohorts. Multivariate regression analysis confirmed ERAS as an independent factor associated with reduced LOS (OR=1.733, p=0.038), LPS (OR=1.901, p=0.015), postoperative pain (OR=5.014, p=0.035), and complications (OR=5.235, p=0.021). CONCLUSION: ERAS protocols are safe and effective in enhancing postoperative recovery for older adult patients with HCC undergoing hepatectomy, supporting their adoption as standard perioperative care for this population.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。