Abstract
OBJECTIVES: According to the ideation-to-action framework of suicidality, suicidal ideation and suicidal action arise via distinct trajectories. Studying suicidality under this framework requires accurate identification of both ideation and action. We sought to assess the accuracy of International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM) codes for suicidal ideation and action in emergency department encounters. METHODS: Accuracy of ICD-10-CM coding for suicidality was assessed through chart review of clinical notes for 205 emergency department encounters among patients 6-18 years old at a large academic pediatric hospital between June 1, 2016 and June 1, 2022. Physician notes were reviewed for documentation of past or present suicidal ideation, suicidal action, or both. The study cohort consisted of 103 randomly selected "cases," or encounters assigned at least 1 ICD-10-CM code for suicidality, and 102 propensity-matched "noncases" lacking ICD-10-CM codes. Accuracy of ICD-10-CM codes was assessed using sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value. RESULTS: Against a gold standard chart review, the positive predictive value for ICD-10-CM suicidality codes was 86.9% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 84.5%-89.3%), and the negative predictive value was 76.2% (95% CI: 73.2%-79.2%). Nearly half of encounters involving suicidality were not captured by ICD-10-CM coding (sensitivity = 53.4%; 95% CI: 49.9%-56.9%). Sensitivity was higher for ideation-present (82.4%, 95% CI: 77.7%-87.1%) than for action-present (33.7%, 95% CI: 27.9%-39.5%) or action-past (20.4%, 95% CI: 15.5%-25.3%). CONCLUSIONS: Many cases of suicidality may be missed by relying on only ICD-10-CM codes. Accuracy of ICD-10-CM codes is high for suicidal ideation but low for action. To scale the ideation-to-action model for use in large populations, better data sources are needed to identify cases of suicidal action.